Of Interest:
Theories of Mercury’s formation have been developed to explain its
unusually large metal-to-silicate ratio compared to Venus, Earth, and
Mars. These theories generally fall into one of two categories; physical
removal of silicates, or differences in the composition material from
which Mercury formed compared with other solar system bodies. Two of the
physical models invoke one or more giant impacts (left) or the
vaporization of surface by a hot solar nebula to remove the planet’s
original crust and outer mantle. Chemical models describe the material
from which Mercury formed, for example, refractory condensates or
primitive precursory material (right). The abundances of potassium,
thorium, and uranium on the surface of Mercury measured by the MESSENGER Gamma-Ray Spectrometer
rule out the giant impact, vaporization, and refractory condensation
models. Formation from primitive material, similar to some forms of
chondritic meteorites, is consistent with the GRS measurements.
| |
Credits - Left: NASA/JPL/Caltech; Right: Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature [473(7348):460–461, © 2011] |
Cookies
This blog uses cookies. To use this blog you must consent to the use of cookies.
Friday, 30 September 2011
How Was Mercury Made? : Nasa Messenger Mission Date presented 29 Sept 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
Weekly Bright Comet Info
Messier Catalog Images
The Whole NGC
Google Search Box

Custom Search
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.